Semiotic Drift

007 · Zero

°


The zero degree is therefore not a total absence (this is a common mistake), it is a significant absence. We have here a pure differential state; the zero degree testifies to the power held by any system of signs, of creating meaning ‘out of nothing’: ‘the language can be content with an opposition of something and nothing.’1

Paragraph break ≠ fragment break.

Fragment break = °

° = zero degree

° = ‘pure differential state’

° / fragment

° = /

The fragment does not stand alone. It exists in constellation with other fragments. It pushes against the hierarchy of signification.

The ‘zero degree’ is the unmarked term in a privative opposition. Meaning emerges through difference. The concept passes from phonology into semantics, where Barthes invokes the ‘zero sign’:

‘a “zero sign” is spoken of in cases where the absence of any explicit signifier functions by itself as a signifier’2

white space ≈ zero sign

° = mark

The ° gives the absence a form. The gap acquires a mark.

The ° performs the work of the barre oblique. It separates and connects.

° / °

Barthes leaves the binary principle unresolved. Complex systems may exceed ‘the opposition of a mark and a zero degree’.3

° = °

° / °

  1. Roland Barthes, Elements of Semiology, trans. by Annette Lavers and Colin Smith (Atlantic Books, 1997), p. 77.

  2. Ibid.

  3. Ibid., p. 80.